The debate between microfinance banks and commercial banks is no longer theoretical. Many people and small businesses are losing trust in traditional banks, which often fail to meet their real financial needs.
Across emerging markets, customers are moving toward institutions that meet them where they are. Rising informal businesses, high loan refusal rates, digital financial tools, and an increasing underbanked population are changing traditional banking.
At its core, the debate isn’t about which bank is “better”; it’s about relevance.
Commercial banks were designed for large deposits and low-risk borrowers. Their systems cater to salaried employees, established companies, and customers with verified financial records.
Microfinance banks, on the other hand, are built for those outside this structure: traders, informal workers, artisans, small shops, and emerging entrepreneurs with limited or no formal income verification.
The question isn’t superiority—it’s who serves today’s evolving, tech-driven financial world.
Microfinance banks are filling an unmet demand. Millions in emerging markets earn daily or weekly incomes and run unregistered, small-scale businesses with no audited accounts or credit histories. Commercial banks often turn them away as “high risk.”
Microfinance banks assess customers differently: cash flow, business activity, community knowledge, and repayment behavior. The result? Trust grows, adoption follows, and banking becomes accessible where traditional institutions fail.
Growth stems from usefulness. When any person is able to create bank accounts and have easy access to small-scale loans, trust begins to grow, and adoption follows naturally. For small businesses, this segment is one of the fastest-growing areas of financial services, not because of marketing, but because of usefulness.
Image: Unsplash
Commercial banks have strict requirements:
Many small businesses cannot meet these conditions due to informality. Banks see them as risks; business owners feel excluded. In reality, commercial banks are just operating as designed.
Microfinance banks offer:
Loan officers visit borrowers’ shops, assess real activity, and make repayment decisions based on observable cash flow. Rates are higher, but speed and accessibility make loans valuable. For small businesses, quick access is sometimes more important than interest rates.
Are commercial banks becoming irrelevant? The answer is no, they’re not; their roles are becoming different now.
What they are losing is exclusivity as the dominant lending institution, high-value customer ownership, and the default banking choice for everyone.
However, commercial banks still dominate certain financial areas:
Different institutions now serve different layers of the economy. Microfinance banks complement commercial banks—they specialize in specific needs without replacing them.
Most people in emerging markets work in the informal sector. Cash-based businesses, volatile incomes, and gig work remain common. Microfinance banks are built for these realities.
Banking in emerging markets will be layered, not one-size-fits-all. Microfinance banks, commercial banks, and fintech solutions will serve different economic realities.
For more context, see Inside the Companies Fueling Africa’s Next Economic Leap.
Fintech is also a player in this case, but it functions in a different role.
Fintech improves:
While microfinance focuses on credit and relationships, fintech banks like Opay, Palmpay, etc., and microfinance banks work together and function as one.
In many cases, fintech and microfinance banks complement each other. Digital tools reduce operating costs, while microfinance institutions provide trust and physical presence.
This combination has been effective in defining how banking is changing, especially for people and small businesses that had no access to commercial banking and its benefits.
If some users are abandoning the commercial banks, which other financial institutions are they turning to?
For many people, it is not one institution but a mix:
This fragmentation reflects unmet needs, not rebellion. Commercial banks remain essential but are no longer the only access point for financial services.
Access to finance drives business growth, employment, and household stability.
When large segments of the population are excluded, economic growth slows. Microfinance banks bridge this gap, prompting attention from policymakers, investors, and regulators. Inclusion is important—but so is functional economic participation.
The future will favor relevance. Institutions that:
…will thrive.
Commercial banks are adapting, creating products for small businesses and partnering with fintech and microfinance institutions. The rise of microfinance banks highlights gaps that commercial banks must address.
Concluding, banking for the underbanked is now a major market. Growth stems from usefulness, not marketing. The structure of banking is evolving to meet the real needs of both formal and informal businesses. The commercial system is not breaking—it is reorganizing.